Thursday, October 26, 2006

What's wrong with Ricky Gervais's Extras?

I suspected something was wrong with Ricky Gervais when he, and writing partner Stephen Merchant, ended The Office with a two-part Christmas special, in which its star-crossed lovers became uncrossed, so to speak, and all lived happily ever after.

It was lovely, don't get me wrong. But at that moment, when Dawn and Tim kissed, a whole country was watching. And it applauded. Long gone were the days when you and your few like-minded friends would cringe at David Brent, the world's most annoying boss. Now annoying bosses all over the country were watching. And they'd bought the DVD.

Then came along Extras and an admirable effort to shed the catch-phrase loving contingent of Gervais's mainstream audience. Viewing figures dropped and, for the first season at least, Gervais and Merchant remembered how to make a cult TV show.

They just forgot to make it funny.

Okay, that's not fair. It has its moments. But, as the second series finished last week, I wondered, what's wrong with Extras?

I came up with this:

  • Andy Millman is the least funny character
    Ricky Gervais is Andy Millman, struggling bit-part actor who gave up his day job in the hope of achieving fame and fortune. Actually, Ricky Gervais is Ricky Gervais, which is not to say unfunny, but it's unimaginative. There's very little creation in the character. Ashley Jenson (Maggie); Stephen Merchant, who plays Darren, Andy's incompetent agent; and Barry "off Eastenders" have less screen time but much more realised characters, far more funny in their absurdity. "Have a bit a muffin." Brilliant. That's some funny stuff.
  • He's inconsistent
    David Brent was, like Maggie, Darren and Barry, a more consistent character. In Extras, Ricky Gervais alternates between Andy Millman, the podcasting Ricky Gervais and David Brent. He is, in one scene, cool, condescending and cringingly crude - but rarely consistent.
  • It's difficult to sympathise with him
    It's like how do you relate to 50 Cent, now that he's off the street and making millions? Okay, bad example. I doubt many of you were ever on the street, or being shot at for that matter. I don't even like rap...what's my point? My point is, by the second series of Extras, Andy Millman's biggest gripe is that he's late for a meeting with Al Pacino. It's hardly Dog Day Afternoon.

There is no doubting Ricky Gervais's enormous talent. The man has actually made me wee laughing. That's funny. But, with Extras, there is something wrong. And I dread to think that it's Ricky Gervais.

I hope with his next project he can either deliver a character as creative and consistent as David Brent or remain behind the cameras as a stellar screenwriter and director. Maybe we'll see more of writing partner Stephen Merchant. Give him a spin-off show with Barry off Eastenders and I might just wee myself. That's some funny stuff. Right there.

4 comments:

sarah said...

hey stan!!
how are you? i demand another blog entry about the gym, and kevin, officially the most annoying persion you have ever met!!
xxx

San Sharma said...

How am I? How are you?! Where are you?

Loving your blog, by the way. And you, of course. Wuv you! xxx

simoncolumb said...

I only found this blog when typing 'Extras' and 'Ricky Gervais' as one of my google alerts. So, quickly - though I have a blog that goes into more depth - the second series didn't try to be as constantly funny as the first, but i think the series should continue because there is now more depth with the characters. Thats all - but i do see your point with 'Andy Millman' - sometimes you think he is cool, other times you think he is a complete arse (Namely the one with ian McKellan - why did he care so much? they were hardly best friends in the audience) - so,yes, he is rather inconsistant.

San Sharma said...

Alright Simon? Thanks for the comment. I enjoyed your blog man! And I totally agree with your comments about That Mitchell and Webb Look.

I think I was however a bit harsh on Extras. It's still great TV but, I think, if there's a third series it could benefit from being more focused. And also, I didn't mention, have better stories.

I think the first series was superior in that respect. Each episode saw an a-list celebrity in a pretty hilarious situation. The episodes were a bit more thematic. For example, the one with Samuel L. Jackson was race comedy (and brilliant); the one with Kate Winslet as a potty-mouthed nun joked about religion. In series 2 however I find there's a lot going on in each episode.

But then that's a result, I guess, of Andy Millman's "success"! But I liked your point about Extras as satire and When the Whistle Blows as a sort of play within play.